Secretary General and High Rappresentative for Foreign Affairs

Secretary General and High Rappresentative for Foreign Affairs
Visualizzazione post con etichetta WOS-IPSP. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta WOS-IPSP. Mostra tutti i post

venerdì 18 settembre 2026

INVEST IN PEACE: THE GLOBAL IMPERATIVE OF SEPTEMBER 21st

By Marco Baragli

Contribution for the International Day of Peace – 21 September 2026

Every year on September 21st, the world observes the International Day of Peace, a global observance established by the United Nations to renew the collective commitment to non-violence, diplomacy and peace.

In an increasingly complex geopolitical climate, the 2026 United Nations campaign, “Hear Us. Act Now for a Peaceful World,” emphasizes the need for concrete action and highlights, in particular, the importance of listening to, investing in and partnering with young people as agents of peace.

The fundamental objective is to emphasize that stability is not merely a passive state — the simple absence of war — but an active, ongoing process that requires concrete investments in education, human rights, social justice and inclusive societies.

The United Nations inextricably links the concept of peace to the 2030 Agenda, particularly through Sustainable Development Goal 16, which focuses on peace, justice and strong institutions.

The key focal points range from significantly reducing all forms of violence and related death rates worldwide to promoting the rule of law nationally and internationally and ensuring equal access to justice for all.

Concurrently, efforts are directed toward combating illicit financial and arms flows, tackling organized crime, fostering transparent and accountable institutions, and ensuring inclusive, participatory and representative decision-making processes.

Alongside the United Nations, international and intergovernmental bodies such as the World Organization of States (WOS-IPSP) can play an important role in strengthening multilateral cooperation for peace.

Through dialogue, mediation and preventive diplomacy, international organizations can contribute to defusing geopolitical tensions before they develop into open conflicts, while encouraging respect for sovereignty and transboundary cooperation in areas involving crucial resources such as water and energy.

Equitable economic development also represents an important instrument for stability and for addressing the conditions that can contribute to poverty, instability and humanitarian crises. International cooperation remains equally essential in protecting refugees and civilian populations affected by conflict.

The intersection between the United Nations' strategic vision and the practical action of international organizations demonstrates that conflict prevention, the reduction of inequalities and humanitarian diplomacy are interconnected dimensions of the same commitment to peace.

Ultimately, September 21st serves as a vital reminder that building a peaceful society extends far beyond international negotiation tables.

It demands the daily contribution of citizens, institutions and international organizations alike through tolerance, cooperation, dialogue and an unwavering commitment to justice and human dignity.

giovedì 20 agosto 2026

Youth Radicalization: Recognizing Warning Signs Without Turning Prevention into Suspicion



Family, dialogue and critical thinking as the first line of prevention against manipulation, extremism and violence

By Ahmed Dahir Osman
Researcher | Public Health & Community Prevention | Radicalization Prevention
Senior Advisor – World Organization of States – WOS-IPSP, Intergovernmental Organization (IGO)

Youth radicalization is a challenge that concerns families, schools, religious communities, institutions and civil society. The Internet and social media have greatly expanded opportunities for knowledge and communication, but they have also enabled extremist ideologies and manipulative individuals to reach young people across geographical borders.

When addressing this phenomenon, however, it is essential to avoid an equally dangerous mistake: confusing normal changes during adolescence, religious commitment or political opinions with automatic signs of radicalization.

There is no single behaviour that can prove that a young person is becoming radicalized. What deserves attention is rather a combination of significant, persistent and sudden changes in behaviour, relationships and the way a young person perceives others.

Warning Signs That Deserve Attention

A progressive withdrawal from family and long-standing friends may be something to observe, particularly when accompanied by new online relationships that are deliberately kept secret.

Particular attention should be given to situations in which someone met online asks a young person to conceal the relationship, attempts to separate them from family or friends, demands demonstrations of loyalty, or uses fear, guilt or threats to influence their decisions.

Another significant warning sign may be the gradual development of an absolute worldview based on an increasingly rigid distinction between “us” and “them.”

Having strong religious beliefs, taking an interest in politics, discussing wars, denouncing injustice or criticizing governments and institutions does not constitute radicalization. Concern becomes more justified when entire communities are described as inferior, evil or deserving of harm, particularly when hatred begins to be accompanied by the justification or encouragement of violence.

Understand Before Judging

Exposure to violent images or extremist content online should also be approached carefully.

A young person may encounter such material accidentally, out of curiosity or because someone else sends it to them. Seeing disturbing content does not necessarily mean agreeing with it.

Before drawing conclusions, it is far more useful to understand what the young person has seen, how they reacted, where the material came from and, above all, whether someone is repeatedly and deliberately sending it to them.

Effective prevention therefore begins with dialogue rather than labelling.

A simple question such as “I have noticed some changes recently. Is everything okay?” may open a door that an accusation could close permanently.

Religion and Identity Are Not Radicalization

This principle is particularly important when discussing Muslim children and teenagers.

Becoming more observant, attending a place of worship more frequently, wearing religious clothing, asking questions about faith, discussing the suffering of a population or expressing anger about discrimination are not, in themselves, indicators of extremism.

Confusing religious practice with radicalization is not only unfair; it can also produce the opposite of the intended result by increasing isolation and mistrust.

Freedom of religion and freedom of opinion must be protected. The line that must not be crossed is the promotion of hatred, manipulation and, above all, the justification or preparation of violence.

The Family as the First Space for Prevention

The strongest protection begins long before a problem emerges.

A family environment in which a young person can speak freely, ask difficult questions and even express controversial opinions without immediately being condemned can provide an important barrier against those who seek to manipulate them.

Young people should be encouraged to develop critical thinking, understand how online manipulation works, maintain healthy friendships, pursue education, sports and social activities, and find positive spaces in which to develop their identity and sense of belonging.

A young person who feels listened to and respected is also more likely to seek help when someone attempts to pressure, manipulate or control them.

Prevention Without Creating Fear

For the World Organization of States – WOS-IPSP, an Intergovernmental Organization (IGO) committed to promoting peace, global security, dialogue among States and international cooperation, preventing radicalization and violent extremism requires a balanced approach involving families, educators, religious communities, civil society and public institutions.

Security cannot be based solely on surveillance or control. It must also be supported by education, inclusion, critical thinking, dialogue and trust.

Protecting young people means preventing others from exploiting their vulnerabilities, their need for belonging or their sense of injustice in order to lead them towards hatred and violence.

Prevention is not about monitoring every thought or belief of a young person. It is about creating conditions strong enough to enable them to think independently, recognize manipulation and reject violence.

It is through this balance between security, freedom, education and dialogue that families, communities and institutions can build effective and sustainable prevention.
Italian
Radicalizzazione giovanile: riconoscere i segnali senza trasformare la prevenzione in sospetto

Famiglia, dialogo e pensiero critico come prima linea di prevenzione contro manipolazione, estremismo e violenza

A cura di Ahmed Dahir Osman
Ricercatore | Salute pubblica e prevenzione comunitaria | Prevenzione della radicalizzazione
Senior Advisor – World Organization of States – WOS-IPSP, Organizzazione Intergovernativa (IGO)

La radicalizzazione dei giovani è una sfida che riguarda famiglie, scuole, comunità religiose, istituzioni e società civile. Internet e i social media hanno ampliato enormemente le possibilità di conoscenza e comunicazione, ma hanno anche consentito a ideologie estremiste e soggetti manipolatori di raggiungere ragazzi molto giovani oltre ogni confine geografico.

Di fronte a questo fenomeno è però necessario evitare un errore altrettanto pericoloso: confondere i normali cambiamenti dell'adolescenza, la pratica religiosa o le opinioni politiche con segnali automatici di radicalizzazione.

Non esiste infatti un singolo comportamento capace di dimostrare che un giovane stia intraprendendo un percorso di radicalizzazione. Ciò che deve richiamare l'attenzione è piuttosto la combinazione di cambiamenti significativi, persistenti e improvvisi nel comportamento, nelle relazioni e nel modo di percepire gli altri.

I segnali che meritano attenzione

Un progressivo isolamento dalla famiglia e dagli amici di sempre può rappresentare un elemento da osservare, soprattutto quando si accompagna alla nascita di rapporti online mantenuti deliberatamente nel segreto.

Particolare attenzione dovrebbe essere riservata alle situazioni nelle quali una persona conosciuta attraverso Internet chiede al giovane di nascondere la relazione, cerca di allontanarlo dalla famiglia o dagli amici, pretende prove di lealtà oppure utilizza paura, senso di colpa o minacce per influenzarne le decisioni.

Un altro elemento significativo può essere la progressiva costruzione di una visione assoluta del mondo fondata su una contrapposizione sempre più rigida tra “noi” e “loro”.

Avere convinzioni religiose profonde, interessarsi alla politica, discutere delle guerre, denunciare ingiustizie o criticare governi e istituzioni non costituisce radicalizzazione. La situazione diventa invece più preoccupante quando intere comunità vengono descritte come inferiori, malvagie o meritevoli di essere colpite, soprattutto quando all'odio comincia ad accompagnarsi la giustificazione o l'incoraggiamento della violenza.

Comprendere prima di giudicare

Anche l'esposizione a immagini violente o contenuti estremisti online deve essere affrontata con attenzione.

Un giovane può incontrare questi materiali accidentalmente, per curiosità o perché qualcuno glieli invia. Vedere un contenuto inquietante non significa necessariamente condividerlo.

Prima di formulare conclusioni, è molto più utile comprendere cosa abbia visto il giovane, quale sia stata la sua reazione, da dove provenga il materiale e, soprattutto, se qualcuno continui deliberatamente a inviarglielo.

La prevenzione efficace nasce quindi dal dialogo, non dall'etichettatura.

Una semplice domanda come “Ho notato alcuni cambiamenti ultimamente. Va tutto bene?” può aprire una porta che un'accusa rischierebbe invece di chiudere definitivamente.

Religione e identità non sono radicalizzazione

Questo principio assume particolare importanza quando si parla di bambini e adolescenti musulmani.

Diventare più praticanti, frequentare maggiormente un luogo di culto, indossare abiti religiosi, porre domande sulla fede, discutere delle sofferenze di una popolazione o manifestare indignazione davanti alla discriminazione non costituiscono, di per sé, indicatori di estremismo.

Confondere la pratica religiosa con la radicalizzazione non soltanto è ingiusto, ma può produrre l'effetto opposto a quello desiderato, aumentando isolamento e sfiducia.

La libertà religiosa e la libertà di opinione devono essere tutelate. La linea che non deve essere oltrepassata è quella della promozione dell'odio, della manipolazione e, soprattutto, della giustificazione o preparazione della violenza.

La famiglia come primo spazio di prevenzione

La protezione più efficace comincia molto prima che emerga un problema.

Una famiglia nella quale un giovane può parlare liberamente, fare domande difficili e persino esprimere opinioni controverse senza essere immediatamente condannato può rappresentare una barriera importante contro chi cerca di manipolarlo.

I giovani devono essere incoraggiati a sviluppare il pensiero critico, comprendere come funzionano le tecniche di manipolazione online, mantenere amicizie sane, dedicarsi allo studio, allo sport e alle attività sociali e trovare spazi positivi nei quali sviluppare la propria identità e il proprio senso di appartenenza.

Un giovane che si sente ascoltato e rispettato sarà anche più disposto a chiedere aiuto quando qualcuno tenterà di esercitare su di lui pressioni, manipolazione o controllo.

Prevenire senza creare paura

Per la World Organization of States – WOS-IPSP, Organizzazione Intergovernativa (IGO), impegnata nella promozione della pace, della sicurezza globale, del dialogo tra gli Stati e della cooperazione internazionale, la prevenzione della radicalizzazione e dell'estremismo violento richiede un approccio equilibrato che coinvolga famiglie, educatori, comunità religiose, società civile e istituzioni pubbliche.

La sicurezza non può essere fondata esclusivamente sulla sorveglianza o sul controllo. Deve essere accompagnata da educazione, inclusione, pensiero critico, dialogo e fiducia.

Proteggere i giovani significa impedire che qualcuno possa sfruttarne le fragilità, il bisogno di appartenenza o il senso di ingiustizia per condurli verso l'odio e la violenza.

La prevenzione non consiste nel controllare ogni pensiero o convinzione di un giovane. Significa creare condizioni sufficientemente solide affinché possa pensare autonomamente, riconoscere la manipolazione e rifiutare la violenza.

È attraverso questo equilibrio tra sicurezza, libertà, educazione e dialogo che famiglie, comunità e istituzioni possono costruire una prevenzione efficace e sostenibile.

sabato 11 luglio 2026

Crystal Mosque Calls on WOS-IPSP to Strengthen Dialogue for Peace in Malaysia



Kuala Terengganu (Malaysia), 11 July 2026
Crystal Mosque Calls on WOS-IPSP to Strengthen Dialogue for Peace in Malaysia
At the Crystal Mosque in Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia, a meeting took place between the Cooperation Counselor of the World Organization of States – International Parliament for Safety and Peace (WOS-IPSP), an intergovernmental organization, Rev. Marco Baragli, and the President of the mosque, Dr. Fazal b. Ismail. The meeting focused on promoting interreligious dialogue, peaceful coexistence, and strengthening cooperation at the local and international levels.
At the conclusion of the meeting, Dr. Ismail requested that an official photograph be taken inside the mosque, facing the Qibla, the direction of Mecca. The gesture was intended to symbolize the shared commitment to conducting dialogue in a spirit of respect, transparency, and responsibility, placing peace and mutual understanding at the center of future cooperation.
The discussions highlighted the challenges currently affecting interreligious relations in parts of Malaysia. According to Dr. Ismail, initiatives aimed at opening channels of dialogue between different religious communities often encounter significant obstacles, limiting opportunities for constructive engagement. In this context, Father Marco Baragli emphasized the importance of building cooperation around shared humanitarian and social values rather than focusing on theological differences. The discussion explored how common objectives—including education, solidarity, social cohesion, and respect for human dignity—can provide a practical foundation for lasting dialogue.
Within this framework, the President of the Crystal Mosque formally expressed his desire for the WOS-IPSP to facilitate contacts and create opportunities for cooperation among religious, institutional, and civil society representatives in Malaysia, with the objective of encouraging initiatives dedicated to peace and mutual understanding.
The meeting also addressed broader international developments, including the current tensions in the Middle East. During the exchange, Dr. Ismail reflected on the historical coexistence between Jewish and Muslim communities in Persia and expressed concern that contemporary conflicts increasingly overshadow centuries of shared history. Participants underlined that sustainable peace requires continuous dialogue, diplomacy, and mutual recognition, while acknowledging that modern conflicts are often influenced by complex political, strategic, and economic dynamics extending beyond religious considerations.
The meeting concluded with a shared commitment to continue promoting dialogue, confidence-building measures, and international cooperation as essential instruments for preventing conflict and strengthening peaceful coexistence among peoples and nations, in line with the mission of the World Organization of States – International Parliament for Safety and Peace (WOS-IPSP), an intergovernmental organization.

sabato 4 luglio 2026

Interfaith Dialogue in Malaysia: A Shared Prayer for Peace at the Kapitan Keling Mosque

GEORGE TOWN (PENANG), Malaysia – 4 July 2026

The World Organization of States – International Parliament for Safety and Peace (WOS-IPSP), an intergovernmental organization, welcomes initiatives that strengthen dialogue among religious communities as an essential contribution to international peace and mutual understanding.

On 4 July, the historic Kapitan Keling Mosque in George Town, Penang, hosted a meaningful meeting dedicated to interfaith dialogue and cooperation. Representing the WOS-IPSP, Father Marco Baragli, Counselor for International Cooperation, accompanied by his wife, Mrs. Anna Delli Muti, was warmly received by Mr. Hafiz Tahir, representing the President of the mosque, Mr. Haji Kamurudin Bin Abdullah.

The meeting was marked by an atmosphere of friendship, mutual respect, and sincere openness. During the visit, participants reflected on the importance of prayer as a path toward peace and discussed the shared ethical values found in the Qur'an and the Bible. The dialogue also explored the understanding of God's attributes in both religious traditions, emphasizing the importance of respect while acknowledging theological differences.

At the same time, members of the local community engaged in conversations with Mrs. Anna Delli Muti, creating an opportunity for cultural exchange and strengthening relationships based on mutual trust and understanding.

Malaysia represents a significant example of religious and cultural diversity. In a society where different faiths and ethnic communities coexist, initiatives such as this demonstrate that dialogue, respect, and cooperation remain indispensable instruments for promoting social harmony and preventing polarization.

Following the meeting, Father Marco Baragli contacted Amb. Alfredo Maiolese, Secretary General of the WOS-IPSP and President of the European Muslims League, to share the positive outcome of the visit and discuss future opportunities for strengthening cooperation between religious communities through cultural and diplomatic initiatives.

The WOS-IPSP reaffirms its commitment to supporting dialogue among civilizations and religions as an essential element of preventive diplomacy, conflict prevention, and sustainable peace. Encounters such as the one held in George Town demonstrate that mutual respect and sincere dialogue continue to build bridges where others see divisions.

Statement by Amb. Alfredo Maiolese, Secretary General of the WOS-IPSP

"Every sincere encounter between believers who choose dialogue over prejudice represents an investment in peace. Respecting one another's identity while working together for the common good is one of the strongest foundations for international cooperation. The experience in George Town reminds us that diplomacy also grows through personal relationships, mutual listening, and the shared commitment to human dignity."